RoPP 活动成功推迟了新的 Bin Tax

UPDATE 15 AUGUST 2020: RoPP campaign successful in delaying new Bin Tax

We are pleased to see that the Bin Tax will not be introduced this financial year, according to Port Phillip’s updated web page.

Thanks to all for your help with our Bin Tax campaign!

The best way to ensure your rates are reduced to be in line with neighbouring councils, is to vote for a RoPP endorsed candidate at the upcoming October election. We will be releasing the exciting news about our endorsed candidates soon, so stay tuned.

  • At the 4th December 2019 Council meeting, a “Waste and Amenity levy” was proposed to address the waste crisis, forecasted to add $64 million over the next 10 years to Council’s “rate cap challenge”. RoPP spoke at that meeting in opposition to the new Tax, unless the Council could provide more information.
  • We finally received a written response from the CEO on July 2nd 2020, confirming that Council were considering options of how to fund the Bin Tax, including the levy being additional to existing rates.
  • Our poster and leaflet campaign to stop the Bin Tax commenced on 30th July 2020.
  • Council’s website still detailed the impending Bin Tax. Now those details have been removed, replaced instead with a statement about the deferral.
  • Why would Council remove the details from their website? As of writing this, the minutes of the 4th December 2019 Council meeting where the Bin Tax was voted on, are also no longer available on their website. Further, we have discovered that almost 20 years of Council meeting agendas & minutes have been removed in the last week.
  • Please refer to the end of this webpage for details of the Essential Services Commission’s role in waste levies.

The facts and our transparency speak for themselves. The Council’s backdown on a new Bin Tax shows that our campaign has had an impact. Council have rightly recognised the harshness of introducing a new tax on top of the burden of existing rates, in a time of economic crisis.

Port Phillip Council is one of the highest spending councils in the state and are now proposing to introduce an additional Waste and Amenity levy on top of the exorbitant rates you already pay.
See https://ropp.org.au/fact-check-how-high-are-port-phillip-rates-compared-to-neighbouring-councils/

So in addition to a 2% increase to total rates collected this year (the maximum allowable under the State government’s rate cap system), you would have to pay a levy for ‘Waste and Amenity’, “A BIN TAX” on this fundamental service. This would severely impact both ratepayers and residents at a time when many have lost their livelihoods, incomes and ability to pay.

Council claims that the reason they need to charge a new levy is because waste costs are rising at a greater pace than inflation. There are two issues with this:

1. Waste management, a core service of council, only accounts for 5.3% of the Port Phillip budget[1], meaning that even if this component increased by 10% per year, the effect on the overall budget would only be around 1-1.2%, well within the 2% rate cap.

2. Competent management should be able to absorb this fundamental service easily, by forecasting these cost issues and re-prioritising their budget accordingly. Instead, the majority of the 2% increase in general rates will go towards wage rises for staff, which council has stubbornly refused to address (or even acknowledge).

Council wants to take the easy way out yet again, by charging ratepayers a new BIN TAX instead of doing the hard work necessary to manage the budget.

The waste and amenity levy (BIN TAX) would sit outside the 2% annual rate cap imposed by the Essential Services Commission. This gives council the option to increase the levy by whatever amount it wishes, and you can be sure it will – council will use the levy to fund its inability to manage its own budget. Council describes this inability to live within their own means the ‘rate capping challenge’.

IT’S A NEW TAX ON TOP OF YOUR EXISTING RATES

Councillors did not want to be held accountable at the ballot box for introducing a new tax this year, so have deferred its introduction until after the election. We are here to highlight the issue so that you have the chance to stop council by voting for an independent candidate that will vote against the BIN TAX and hold the council to account. Keep an eye on our website for an independent review of candidates running in the October election.

 We say:
1. ROPP does not support the introduction of a Waste and Amenity Levy in addition to the burden of existing rates. Council need to get the budget under control instead of taking the easy way out: a new Bin Tax

2. Now is not the time to impose new taxes on a struggling economy. It’s not fair and it needs to be stopped.

Essential Services Commission’s role in waste levies
Council can levy a new charge in addition to existing rates, just like two councils did in 2018-19. This is subject to the oversight of the Essential Services Commission, however Councils retain full autonomy to introduce new charges. Council can opt to introduce a waste levy in a revenue neutral way, reducing general rates by the same amount that the new levy raises. This is what Maribyrnong did in 2019-20.

As Port Phillip Council said themselves on the now removed ‘waste challenges’ webpage :
 “Council is also considering a proposal to introduce a waste and amenity levy, which would be a payment separate to Council rates to cover some, or all, of the costs incurred by council to deliver waste, recycling and cleansing services. This would enable Council to set a service rate or charge (levy) that’s in line with the true cost of the service.

...更多
社区
社区
RoPP 活动成功推迟了新的 Bin Tax

UPDATE 15 AUGUST 2020: RoPP campaign successful in delaying new Bin Tax

We are pleased to see that the Bin Tax will not be introduced this financial year, according to Port Phillip’s updated web page.

Thanks to all for your help with our Bin Tax campaign!

The best way to ensure your rates are reduced to be in line with neighbouring councils, is to vote for a RoPP endorsed candidate at the upcoming October election. We will be releasing the exciting news about our endorsed candidates soon, so stay tuned.

  • At the 4th December 2019 Council meeting, a “Waste and Amenity levy” was proposed to address the waste crisis, forecasted to add $64 million over the next 10 years to Council’s “rate cap challenge”. RoPP spoke at that meeting in opposition to the new Tax, unless the Council could provide more information.
  • We finally received a written response from the CEO on July 2nd 2020, confirming that Council were considering options of how to fund the Bin Tax, including the levy being additional to existing rates.
  • Our poster and leaflet campaign to stop the Bin Tax commenced on 30th July 2020.
  • Council’s website still detailed the impending Bin Tax. Now those details have been removed, replaced instead with a statement about the deferral.
  • Why would Council remove the details from their website? As of writing this, the minutes of the 4th December 2019 Council meeting where the Bin Tax was voted on, are also no longer available on their website. Further, we have discovered that almost 20 years of Council meeting agendas & minutes have been removed in the last week.
  • Please refer to the end of this webpage for details of the Essential Services Commission’s role in waste levies.

The facts and our transparency speak for themselves. The Council’s backdown on a new Bin Tax shows that our campaign has had an impact. Council have rightly recognised the harshness of introducing a new tax on top of the burden of existing rates, in a time of economic crisis.

Port Phillip Council is one of the highest spending councils in the state and are now proposing to introduce an additional Waste and Amenity levy on top of the exorbitant rates you already pay.
See https://ropp.org.au/fact-check-how-high-are-port-phillip-rates-compared-to-neighbouring-councils/

So in addition to a 2% increase to total rates collected this year (the maximum allowable under the State government’s rate cap system), you would have to pay a levy for ‘Waste and Amenity’, “A BIN TAX” on this fundamental service. This would severely impact both ratepayers and residents at a time when many have lost their livelihoods, incomes and ability to pay.

Council claims that the reason they need to charge a new levy is because waste costs are rising at a greater pace than inflation. There are two issues with this:

1. Waste management, a core service of council, only accounts for 5.3% of the Port Phillip budget[1], meaning that even if this component increased by 10% per year, the effect on the overall budget would only be around 1-1.2%, well within the 2% rate cap.

2. Competent management should be able to absorb this fundamental service easily, by forecasting these cost issues and re-prioritising their budget accordingly. Instead, the majority of the 2% increase in general rates will go towards wage rises for staff, which council has stubbornly refused to address (or even acknowledge).

Council wants to take the easy way out yet again, by charging ratepayers a new BIN TAX instead of doing the hard work necessary to manage the budget.

The waste and amenity levy (BIN TAX) would sit outside the 2% annual rate cap imposed by the Essential Services Commission. This gives council the option to increase the levy by whatever amount it wishes, and you can be sure it will – council will use the levy to fund its inability to manage its own budget. Council describes this inability to live within their own means the ‘rate capping challenge’.

IT’S A NEW TAX ON TOP OF YOUR EXISTING RATES

Councillors did not want to be held accountable at the ballot box for introducing a new tax this year, so have deferred its introduction until after the election. We are here to highlight the issue so that you have the chance to stop council by voting for an independent candidate that will vote against the BIN TAX and hold the council to account. Keep an eye on our website for an independent review of candidates running in the October election.

 We say:
1. ROPP does not support the introduction of a Waste and Amenity Levy in addition to the burden of existing rates. Council need to get the budget under control instead of taking the easy way out: a new Bin Tax

2. Now is not the time to impose new taxes on a struggling economy. It’s not fair and it needs to be stopped.

Essential Services Commission’s role in waste levies
Council can levy a new charge in addition to existing rates, just like two councils did in 2018-19. This is subject to the oversight of the Essential Services Commission, however Councils retain full autonomy to introduce new charges. Council can opt to introduce a waste levy in a revenue neutral way, reducing general rates by the same amount that the new levy raises. This is what Maribyrnong did in 2019-20.

As Port Phillip Council said themselves on the now removed ‘waste challenges’ webpage :
 “Council is also considering a proposal to introduce a waste and amenity levy, which would be a payment separate to Council rates to cover some, or all, of the costs incurred by council to deliver waste, recycling and cleansing services. This would enable Council to set a service rate or charge (levy) that’s in line with the true cost of the service.

...更多
当地活动和活动
当地活动和活动
RoPP 活动成功推迟了新的 Bin Tax

UPDATE 15 AUGUST 2020: RoPP campaign successful in delaying new Bin Tax

We are pleased to see that the Bin Tax will not be introduced this financial year, according to Port Phillip’s updated web page.

Thanks to all for your help with our Bin Tax campaign!

The best way to ensure your rates are reduced to be in line with neighbouring councils, is to vote for a RoPP endorsed candidate at the upcoming October election. We will be releasing the exciting news about our endorsed candidates soon, so stay tuned.

  • At the 4th December 2019 Council meeting, a “Waste and Amenity levy” was proposed to address the waste crisis, forecasted to add $64 million over the next 10 years to Council’s “rate cap challenge”. RoPP spoke at that meeting in opposition to the new Tax, unless the Council could provide more information.
  • We finally received a written response from the CEO on July 2nd 2020, confirming that Council were considering options of how to fund the Bin Tax, including the levy being additional to existing rates.
  • Our poster and leaflet campaign to stop the Bin Tax commenced on 30th July 2020.
  • Council’s website still detailed the impending Bin Tax. Now those details have been removed, replaced instead with a statement about the deferral.
  • Why would Council remove the details from their website? As of writing this, the minutes of the 4th December 2019 Council meeting where the Bin Tax was voted on, are also no longer available on their website. Further, we have discovered that almost 20 years of Council meeting agendas & minutes have been removed in the last week.
  • Please refer to the end of this webpage for details of the Essential Services Commission’s role in waste levies.

The facts and our transparency speak for themselves. The Council’s backdown on a new Bin Tax shows that our campaign has had an impact. Council have rightly recognised the harshness of introducing a new tax on top of the burden of existing rates, in a time of economic crisis.

Port Phillip Council is one of the highest spending councils in the state and are now proposing to introduce an additional Waste and Amenity levy on top of the exorbitant rates you already pay.
See https://ropp.org.au/fact-check-how-high-are-port-phillip-rates-compared-to-neighbouring-councils/

So in addition to a 2% increase to total rates collected this year (the maximum allowable under the State government’s rate cap system), you would have to pay a levy for ‘Waste and Amenity’, “A BIN TAX” on this fundamental service. This would severely impact both ratepayers and residents at a time when many have lost their livelihoods, incomes and ability to pay.

Council claims that the reason they need to charge a new levy is because waste costs are rising at a greater pace than inflation. There are two issues with this:

1. Waste management, a core service of council, only accounts for 5.3% of the Port Phillip budget[1], meaning that even if this component increased by 10% per year, the effect on the overall budget would only be around 1-1.2%, well within the 2% rate cap.

2. Competent management should be able to absorb this fundamental service easily, by forecasting these cost issues and re-prioritising their budget accordingly. Instead, the majority of the 2% increase in general rates will go towards wage rises for staff, which council has stubbornly refused to address (or even acknowledge).

Council wants to take the easy way out yet again, by charging ratepayers a new BIN TAX instead of doing the hard work necessary to manage the budget.

The waste and amenity levy (BIN TAX) would sit outside the 2% annual rate cap imposed by the Essential Services Commission. This gives council the option to increase the levy by whatever amount it wishes, and you can be sure it will – council will use the levy to fund its inability to manage its own budget. Council describes this inability to live within their own means the ‘rate capping challenge’.

IT’S A NEW TAX ON TOP OF YOUR EXISTING RATES

Councillors did not want to be held accountable at the ballot box for introducing a new tax this year, so have deferred its introduction until after the election. We are here to highlight the issue so that you have the chance to stop council by voting for an independent candidate that will vote against the BIN TAX and hold the council to account. Keep an eye on our website for an independent review of candidates running in the October election.

 We say:
1. ROPP does not support the introduction of a Waste and Amenity Levy in addition to the burden of existing rates. Council need to get the budget under control instead of taking the easy way out: a new Bin Tax

2. Now is not the time to impose new taxes on a struggling economy. It’s not fair and it needs to be stopped.

Essential Services Commission’s role in waste levies
Council can levy a new charge in addition to existing rates, just like two councils did in 2018-19. This is subject to the oversight of the Essential Services Commission, however Councils retain full autonomy to introduce new charges. Council can opt to introduce a waste levy in a revenue neutral way, reducing general rates by the same amount that the new levy raises. This is what Maribyrnong did in 2019-20.

As Port Phillip Council said themselves on the now removed ‘waste challenges’ webpage :
 “Council is also considering a proposal to introduce a waste and amenity levy, which would be a payment separate to Council rates to cover some, or all, of the costs incurred by council to deliver waste, recycling and cleansing services. This would enable Council to set a service rate or charge (levy) that’s in line with the true cost of the service.

...更多
认识 RoPP 议员
认识 RoPP 议员
菲利普港湾(Port Phillip)的房价与邻近的议会相比如何?
如果您住在我们毗邻的议会之一(例如Bayside,Stonnington或Glen Eira),您的房价将是多少?这是您找出真实情况的机会。

单击下面的链接转到我们的费率计算器,您只需在其中输入您的财产价值并查找。
https://ropp.org.au/compare-your-rates-how-does-port-phillip-compare-with-neighbouring-councils/

...更多
考虑一下
Promotion
Promotion
Promotion
我的丈夫坎贝尔和我在我们的中学公园家中养育了两个漂亮的女儿。
多年来,我们经历过与市政局相关的所有常规经历,从房屋翻新到房价费率的惊人增长。

多年来,我相信安理会具有与我相同的信念和标准。大约在4年前提出RATE CAP之后,我和我丈夫会见了两名议员和CFO,向他们展示了我们对过去20年的费率分析。我们的目的是指出,新的费率制度不公平且不可持续。
我们正在经历8%的复合增长率,并且随着这一计划的继续进行,我们的大部分收入将有一天流向安理会。

我们只是被告知他们无能为力,并考虑对我们的财产进行反向抵押。

我更多地研究了安理会的运作,并参加了安理会会议。在这一点上,我发现了钱的花销,令我们震惊的是,很多钱似乎是浪费在政治驱动的项目上,以及过多的安理会工作人员和顾问的预算,而不是社区需求。缺乏透明度和问责制也令人震惊。

作为个人,我发现我们的关注点充耳不闻,但是作为一个整体,我们可以在场并发表自己的声音。
  • 尽管每年都有额外的费用,但我们发现市政当局的服务有所下降
  • 较少的停车位
  • 更昂贵的停车费和罚款
  • 购物带成为死区
  • 街头无家可归者和毒品影响增加

我的孩子长大的可爱地方发生了什么事?

我们的理事会有责任为当地社区提供安全,舒适和充满活力的环境。

建立居民社区和欢迎社区的居民和商人的责任和尊重在哪里?

我们的理事会需要对正在做出的决定以及这些决定如何使我们负担越来越大的生活费用负责。

我正在竞选菲利普港(Port Phillip)的纳税人所认可的候选人,他们是一个关心当地问题的当地人社区团体。 RoPP有来自整个社区的成员,他们共同相信安理会应该推动议程以:

  • 代表社区
  • 促进财政责任和
  • 需求纳税人资金用于地方市政厅的服务和设施

在菲利普港(Port Phillip)的纳税人和社区的支持下,我将在市议会做出更好的决定。

作为一名数学家,我一生都致力于解决与环境有关的问题,为气象局,资源与环境研究中心(ANU)和国家农村中心制定策略和计划以帮助预测和管理环境和天气消防研究。这为我提供了处理复杂问题和找到常识解决方案的经验。

我们需要一个理事会来提高成本效率和问责制,并在纳税人,居民,贸易商和理事会之间进行明智和实际的参与。

我是您的议员,将这个议会交还给居民。

要继续与克里斯蒂娜(Christina)对话以及您附近有任何担忧,请访问https://www.facebook.com/ChristinaSirakoffRoPP/
...更多
Promotion
把当地人放在首位
我是当地居民超过15年,并且在东圣基尔达(East St Kilda)和艾尔伍德(Elwood)都过着非常愉快的生活。

我们真的很幸运能够居住在一个如此多元而充满活力的社区中,具有独特的功能,例如海滩,艾尔伍德运河,公园,社区花园,市场和节日。

你们中许多人可能都在与我打交道,当我收到差价通知书时,我受到了“账单冲击”。我知道我的财产没有按照安理会确定的价格进行估价。

在努力获得更公平,合理的估价的过程中,我不知道我们如何才能继续负担得起我们美好的郊区的生活。

然后,我发现自己质疑安理会对我们当地社区的优先考虑。我对我们的议员如何做出决定感到关切。

他们没有把居民的需求放在首位。

我感到不安的是,议员们将注意力集中在与地方政府无关的问题上,并把他们的注意力从积极改善我们社区的舒适性和活力转移到了其他地方。

我们的郊区需要一个能干和忠诚的议员,代表议员的意见,并且其唯一的决策标准是为了居民的最大利益而确定的。我就是那个人。

我将确保所有理事会行动是:
  • 从财务的角度来看是可持续的,因此各种形式的居民都可以继续生活在我们这个伟大的社区中
  • 并增强了我们郊区的宜居性

曾经充满活力的街道,例如卡莱尔·圣巴拉克拉瓦(Carlisle St Balaclava),已成为安理会对社区漠不关心的受害者。这是无法接受的。

我必须承认我的政治是自由主义的,但是我不认为政治属于地方政府。我选择代表菲利普港(RoPP)的纳税人,他们是一个关注当地问题的当地人社区团体。 RoPP拥有来自社区各地的成员,他们有共同的信念,可以影响理事会制定以下议程:
  • 代表社区
  • 促进财政责任和
  • 要求将宝贵的纳税人资金用于地方市政事务

我拥有一生的经验,可以管理大型组织的战略和流程。我的核心职责一直是为客户提供适应性强的商业成果。我保证将为您服务。

我们需要我们的理事会重新关注为社区提供基本服务的基本原则,以及合理的,可负担的费率结构。

我是您的议员,将问责制带回议会,并着眼于居民的最大利益。

要继续与Rhonda进行对话以及您附近有任何疑虑,请访问https://www.facebook.com/RhondaClarkRoPP/

由R. Clark撰写并授权,邮政信箱2043 South Melbourne 3205
...更多
Promotion
议会使我们的长期老年人难以留在家中。

我们说 - 降低老年人的利率,而不是强迫他们离开家园或负债。

菲利普港有许多居民,比如 Tanya*,他们面临着议会要求他们收取高额费用的噩梦,他们知道他们永远无法支付少量的固定收入或养老金。在大多数情况下,这些居民只是超支的议会和难以承受的房价的无辜受害者。

例如,1983 年阿德里安在米德尔帕克买下他的第一套房子时,年费为 500 美元。现在他们是 5000 美元,但服务水平并没有显着提高。市议会对这些陷入困境的居民的解决方案是将他们的财产反向抵押给市议会或出售并搬到其他地方。然后,市议会对他们的房屋提出警告。

微不足道的“帮助”委员会为养老金卡上的人提供

https://www.portphillip.vic.gov.au/council-services/rates-and-valuations/rates-concessions-and-rates-hardship-relief

菲利普港的许多退休居民都是他们社区的忠实拥护者。许多人在他们现在居住的地区出生和长大,并以我们的郊区为家而自豪。当市议会无情地将利率提高到墨尔本其他地区所没有的水平时,必须对迫使老年人取消抵押房屋的利率体系的公平性提出质疑。

在本已紧张的一年里,菲利普港目前的高利率给我们的老年人增加了不必要的压力。他们只想安静地过着自己的生活,靠着固定的收入,在他们养家糊口的房子里。

我们说——我们不应该容忍这种对老年人的骇人听闻的待遇,我们要求应该降低老年人的费率。理事会每年花费数百万美元用于无聊的意识形态项目,这些项目浪费了我们数百万美元,只会增加退休人员的压力。几乎 42% 的市议会收入用于雇用 800-900 名市政府公务员,比邻近的市政府要多得多,这是我们高利率的原因之一。许多人似乎是为了无休止地写报告而存在,并不直接参与提供服务。这是一个庞大的自私自利的官僚机构,在提高效率和提高生产力方面有很大空间,因此我们可以更好地照顾社区中的弱势群体。真正的慈善事业应该从长期居住在菲利普港市的老年纳税人开始。

我们的议员和我们的议会让我们的居民负债累累。

*Tanya 的故事是真实的,并且在整个菲利普港都有回响,但为了保护她的身份,她的名字和面孔已被更改。市议会为退休人员提供延迟支付地税的选项,直到他们的房产被出售,届时他们将收取未付的地税加上每年 5% 的利息,这实际上是一种反向抵押贷款。

...更多
理事会发布了2021-22年预算草案,以征询社区意见。

理事会已发布了2021-22年预算草案,以征询社区意见。如果您担心安理会再次提高利率的计划并且尚未这样做,请联系以下议员,并要求他们在6月23日对议案进行表决时不要在2021-22预算中提高利率。

  • 巴克斯特
    Tim.Baxter@portphillip.vic.gov.au
    0466 495 250
  • 科普西(Cr Copsey)
    Katherine.Copsey@portphillip.vic.gov.au
    0466 478 949
  • 克劳福德市长
    Louise.Crawford@portphillip.vic.gov.au
    0466 514 643
  • 铬昆索洛
    Heather.Cunsolo@portphillip.vic.gov.au
    0466 227 014
  • 马丁
    彼得·马丁@ portphillip.vic.gov.au
    0435 390 821

只有四位议员公开表示他们支持降息。他们是:

  • 铬键
    Andrew.Bond@portphillip.vic.gov.au
    0481 034 028
  • 克拉克
    Rhonda.Clark@portphillip.vic.gov.au
    0435 098 738
  • 铬珍珠
    马库斯·皮尔@ portphillip.vic.gov.au
    0466 448 272
  • 西拉科夫(Cr Sirakoff)
    克里斯蒂娜·西拉科夫(Christina.Sirakoff@portphillip.vic.gov.au)
    0435 419 930

你还应该知道些什么?
我们认为,理事会必须提高为社区提供服务的效率。安理会告诉我们,冻结价格意味着必须削减服务,但我们说安理会不需要准备没人要或不需要阅读的报告。撰写长度为200或300页的人无法阅读的报告不是一项服务。如果议员投票赞成冻结利率,那么首席执行官及其团队将需要确定效率,而不是削减服务。菲利普港议会否认菲利普港存在房价问题,但纳税人只是痛苦地意识到,他们为相邻议会中具有类似价值的房产所付房价的价格是其两倍,三倍或更多倍。市议会使用平均费率将菲利普港湾与其他市议会进行基准比较,但平均费率具有误导性和欺骗性,因为我们单位/公寓与房屋的比率高得多,而且偏向于平均数/比率偏低。

请参阅以下网址的事实检查:https://ropp.org.au/fact-check-how-high-are-port-phillip-rates-compared-to-neighbouring-councils/

...更多
RoPP 活动成功推迟了新的 Bin Tax

UPDATE 15 AUGUST 2020: RoPP campaign successful in delaying new Bin Tax

We are pleased to see that the Bin Tax will not be introduced this financial year, according to Port Phillip’s updated web page.

Thanks to all for your help with our Bin Tax campaign!

The best way to ensure your rates are reduced to be in line with neighbouring councils, is to vote for a RoPP endorsed candidate at the upcoming October election. We will be releasing the exciting news about our endorsed candidates soon, so stay tuned.

  • At the 4th December 2019 Council meeting, a “Waste and Amenity levy” was proposed to address the waste crisis, forecasted to add $64 million over the next 10 years to Council’s “rate cap challenge”. RoPP spoke at that meeting in opposition to the new Tax, unless the Council could provide more information.
  • We finally received a written response from the CEO on July 2nd 2020, confirming that Council were considering options of how to fund the Bin Tax, including the levy being additional to existing rates.
  • Our poster and leaflet campaign to stop the Bin Tax commenced on 30th July 2020.
  • Council’s website still detailed the impending Bin Tax. Now those details have been removed, replaced instead with a statement about the deferral.
  • Why would Council remove the details from their website? As of writing this, the minutes of the 4th December 2019 Council meeting where the Bin Tax was voted on, are also no longer available on their website. Further, we have discovered that almost 20 years of Council meeting agendas & minutes have been removed in the last week.
  • Please refer to the end of this webpage for details of the Essential Services Commission’s role in waste levies.

The facts and our transparency speak for themselves. The Council’s backdown on a new Bin Tax shows that our campaign has had an impact. Council have rightly recognised the harshness of introducing a new tax on top of the burden of existing rates, in a time of economic crisis.

Port Phillip Council is one of the highest spending councils in the state and are now proposing to introduce an additional Waste and Amenity levy on top of the exorbitant rates you already pay.
See https://ropp.org.au/fact-check-how-high-are-port-phillip-rates-compared-to-neighbouring-councils/

So in addition to a 2% increase to total rates collected this year (the maximum allowable under the State government’s rate cap system), you would have to pay a levy for ‘Waste and Amenity’, “A BIN TAX” on this fundamental service. This would severely impact both ratepayers and residents at a time when many have lost their livelihoods, incomes and ability to pay.

Council claims that the reason they need to charge a new levy is because waste costs are rising at a greater pace than inflation. There are two issues with this:

1. Waste management, a core service of council, only accounts for 5.3% of the Port Phillip budget[1], meaning that even if this component increased by 10% per year, the effect on the overall budget would only be around 1-1.2%, well within the 2% rate cap.

2. Competent management should be able to absorb this fundamental service easily, by forecasting these cost issues and re-prioritising their budget accordingly. Instead, the majority of the 2% increase in general rates will go towards wage rises for staff, which council has stubbornly refused to address (or even acknowledge).

Council wants to take the easy way out yet again, by charging ratepayers a new BIN TAX instead of doing the hard work necessary to manage the budget.

The waste and amenity levy (BIN TAX) would sit outside the 2% annual rate cap imposed by the Essential Services Commission. This gives council the option to increase the levy by whatever amount it wishes, and you can be sure it will – council will use the levy to fund its inability to manage its own budget. Council describes this inability to live within their own means the ‘rate capping challenge’.

IT’S A NEW TAX ON TOP OF YOUR EXISTING RATES

Councillors did not want to be held accountable at the ballot box for introducing a new tax this year, so have deferred its introduction until after the election. We are here to highlight the issue so that you have the chance to stop council by voting for an independent candidate that will vote against the BIN TAX and hold the council to account. Keep an eye on our website for an independent review of candidates running in the October election.

 We say:
1. ROPP does not support the introduction of a Waste and Amenity Levy in addition to the burden of existing rates. Council need to get the budget under control instead of taking the easy way out: a new Bin Tax

2. Now is not the time to impose new taxes on a struggling economy. It’s not fair and it needs to be stopped.

Essential Services Commission’s role in waste levies
Council can levy a new charge in addition to existing rates, just like two councils did in 2018-19. This is subject to the oversight of the Essential Services Commission, however Councils retain full autonomy to introduce new charges. Council can opt to introduce a waste levy in a revenue neutral way, reducing general rates by the same amount that the new levy raises. This is what Maribyrnong did in 2019-20.

As Port Phillip Council said themselves on the now removed ‘waste challenges’ webpage :
 “Council is also considering a proposal to introduce a waste and amenity levy, which would be a payment separate to Council rates to cover some, or all, of the costs incurred by council to deliver waste, recycling and cleansing services. This would enable Council to set a service rate or charge (levy) that’s in line with the true cost of the service.

...更多
地方文化
Promotion
Gasworks提供节日,活动,艺术节,农贸市场。 。 。 。

Gasworks Arts Park 拥有 16 位常驻视觉艺术家和一小队专业工作人员,他们致力于展示年度节日和活动计划,包括墨尔本一些著名的艺术节、农贸市场、课程和工作坊、创意和专业发展机会艺术家,儿童节目等等。此外,每年会场举办超过200场表演艺术活动和30场视觉艺术展览。

Gasworks 位于墨尔本的阿尔伯特公园,在前南墨尔本天然气厂的旧址上。它距离中央商务区 3 公里,该区域拥有 4 公顷的公园、两个剧院、三个画廊空间、一个咖啡厅以及功能和工作室空间。


什么在https://www.gasworks.org.au/whats-on

谷歌地图参考:-37.843317、144.946260

...更多
Linden支持职业艺术家中勇敢的新艺术。
林登新艺术支持处于职业生涯中期的艺术家的勇敢新艺术,并通过鼓舞人心、发人深省的新作品展览吸引游客。

他们定期向艺术家和策展人寻求团体或个展的申请,并优先考虑在菲利普港市生活和工作的艺术家和策展人。

“现在 Linden New Art 所在的土地于 1870 年被犹太移民 Moritz Michaelis(1820-1902 年)购买。这座维多利亚时代的豪宅由著名建筑师 Alfred Friedrich Kursteiner(1829-1897 年)于 1871 年建造,周围的花园由景观园丁和植物学家威廉·吉尔福伊尔 (William Guilfoyle,1840-1912 年),他也是墨尔本皇家植物园的著名设计者。米凯利斯将住宅命名为林登,在德语中意为“椴树”。 - https://www.lindenarts.org/about-us/

...更多
Promotion
Simone Biles:专家说,为什么放弃有时对您的健康有益

“我们不只是运动员。我们毕竟是人,有时你不得不退一步,说:”美国体操选手西蒙尼·比尔斯周二她离开了东京奥运会的赛场上。

本周三,拜尔斯也退出了将于周四举行的 2020 东京奥运会个人艺术体操决赛。

他尚未确认是否会参加接下来几天的比赛决赛于那些在东京合格:跳,高低杠(周日,8月1日),纸牌(周一,8月2日)和平衡木(周二,30)

虽然不是所有的世界上有运动员在世界上最重要的比赛受到Biles或生活的压力下的可视性,运动员的动作可以作为大家的教训和反思,根据BBC新闻巴西采访了心理健康专家。

“今天有更多关于体育、音乐、教育......以及事实的心理健康的讨论ho 的讨论揭开了这个问题的神秘面纱,“临床精神病学家 Lívia Castelo Branco 说。

...更多
位于圣基尔达历史悠久的教区礼堂
40年来,Theater Works一直是澳大利亚高质量剧院的全国性孵化器。富有冒险精神的主持人Theatre Works发掘并提供了一个平台,用于隐藏来自我们当代社区的隐藏声音和未闻故事。作为为数不多的积极寻求多元化,独立艺术家并培育创造性职业发展的艺术组织之一,剧院作品是国家剧院生态学的重要组成部分。
最新消息https://www.theatreworks.org.au/now-playing/2021-season-program/
Google Map编号:-37.86419612298049,144.9760729411019
...更多

希瑟·康索洛 0466 227 014

Heather.Cunsolo@portphillip.vic.gov.au

凯瑟琳·科普西 0466 478 949
Katherine.Copsey@portphillip.vic.gov.au

彼得·马丁 0435 390 821
Peter.Martin@portphillip.vic.gov.au

路易丝·克劳馥 0466 514 643
Louise.Crawford@portphillip.vic.gov.au

蒂姆·巴克斯特 0466 495 250
Tim.Baxter@portphillip.vic.gov.au

五位失去联系的议员——Cunsolo、Baxter、Copsey、Martin 和 Crawford——表现出对居民和纳税人的漠视。

五位议员- 在这些艰难的 Covid 时期投票反对冻结利率。这样做的成本仅为 198 万美元。

五位议员- 拒绝冻结利率,尽管市议会预测现金盈余为 440 万澳元,加上新房产的 230 万澳元。

五名议员- 然后在少数群体的施舍和宠物项目上增加了 135 万美元的支出,对整个社区的贡献很小。

我们说
让政治远离菲利普港。我们支付的高昂费用让居民得到的很少。是时候指责议员们提高我们的费率、浪费金钱并违背居民和纳税人的利益。如果这五位议员不能在 COVID 期间投票赞成冻结利率,他们什么时候会?

...更多
RoPP 活动成功推迟了新的 Bin Tax

UPDATE 15 AUGUST 2020: RoPP campaign successful in delaying new Bin Tax

We are pleased to see that the Bin Tax will not be introduced this financial year, according to Port Phillip’s updated web page.

Thanks to all for your help with our Bin Tax campaign!

The best way to ensure your rates are reduced to be in line with neighbouring councils, is to vote for a RoPP endorsed candidate at the upcoming October election. We will be releasing the exciting news about our endorsed candidates soon, so stay tuned.

  • At the 4th December 2019 Council meeting, a “Waste and Amenity levy” was proposed to address the waste crisis, forecasted to add $64 million over the next 10 years to Council’s “rate cap challenge”. RoPP spoke at that meeting in opposition to the new Tax, unless the Council could provide more information.
  • We finally received a written response from the CEO on July 2nd 2020, confirming that Council were considering options of how to fund the Bin Tax, including the levy being additional to existing rates.
  • Our poster and leaflet campaign to stop the Bin Tax commenced on 30th July 2020.
  • Council’s website still detailed the impending Bin Tax. Now those details have been removed, replaced instead with a statement about the deferral.
  • Why would Council remove the details from their website? As of writing this, the minutes of the 4th December 2019 Council meeting where the Bin Tax was voted on, are also no longer available on their website. Further, we have discovered that almost 20 years of Council meeting agendas & minutes have been removed in the last week.
  • Please refer to the end of this webpage for details of the Essential Services Commission’s role in waste levies.

The facts and our transparency speak for themselves. The Council’s backdown on a new Bin Tax shows that our campaign has had an impact. Council have rightly recognised the harshness of introducing a new tax on top of the burden of existing rates, in a time of economic crisis.

Port Phillip Council is one of the highest spending councils in the state and are now proposing to introduce an additional Waste and Amenity levy on top of the exorbitant rates you already pay.
See https://ropp.org.au/fact-check-how-high-are-port-phillip-rates-compared-to-neighbouring-councils/

So in addition to a 2% increase to total rates collected this year (the maximum allowable under the State government’s rate cap system), you would have to pay a levy for ‘Waste and Amenity’, “A BIN TAX” on this fundamental service. This would severely impact both ratepayers and residents at a time when many have lost their livelihoods, incomes and ability to pay.

Council claims that the reason they need to charge a new levy is because waste costs are rising at a greater pace than inflation. There are two issues with this:

1. Waste management, a core service of council, only accounts for 5.3% of the Port Phillip budget[1], meaning that even if this component increased by 10% per year, the effect on the overall budget would only be around 1-1.2%, well within the 2% rate cap.

2. Competent management should be able to absorb this fundamental service easily, by forecasting these cost issues and re-prioritising their budget accordingly. Instead, the majority of the 2% increase in general rates will go towards wage rises for staff, which council has stubbornly refused to address (or even acknowledge).

Council wants to take the easy way out yet again, by charging ratepayers a new BIN TAX instead of doing the hard work necessary to manage the budget.

The waste and amenity levy (BIN TAX) would sit outside the 2% annual rate cap imposed by the Essential Services Commission. This gives council the option to increase the levy by whatever amount it wishes, and you can be sure it will – council will use the levy to fund its inability to manage its own budget. Council describes this inability to live within their own means the ‘rate capping challenge’.

IT’S A NEW TAX ON TOP OF YOUR EXISTING RATES

Councillors did not want to be held accountable at the ballot box for introducing a new tax this year, so have deferred its introduction until after the election. We are here to highlight the issue so that you have the chance to stop council by voting for an independent candidate that will vote against the BIN TAX and hold the council to account. Keep an eye on our website for an independent review of candidates running in the October election.

 We say:
1. ROPP does not support the introduction of a Waste and Amenity Levy in addition to the burden of existing rates. Council need to get the budget under control instead of taking the easy way out: a new Bin Tax

2. Now is not the time to impose new taxes on a struggling economy. It’s not fair and it needs to be stopped.

Essential Services Commission’s role in waste levies
Council can levy a new charge in addition to existing rates, just like two councils did in 2018-19. This is subject to the oversight of the Essential Services Commission, however Councils retain full autonomy to introduce new charges. Council can opt to introduce a waste levy in a revenue neutral way, reducing general rates by the same amount that the new levy raises. This is what Maribyrnong did in 2019-20.

As Port Phillip Council said themselves on the now removed ‘waste challenges’ webpage :
 “Council is also considering a proposal to introduce a waste and amenity levy, which would be a payment separate to Council rates to cover some, or all, of the costs incurred by council to deliver waste, recycling and cleansing services. This would enable Council to set a service rate or charge (levy) that’s in line with the true cost of the service.

...更多

问这5位议员

希瑟·康索洛 0466 227 014
Heather.Cunsolo@portphillip.vic.gov.au

凯瑟琳·科普西 0466 478 949
Katherine.Copsey@portphillip.vic.gov.au

彼得·马丁 0435 390 821
Peter.Martin@portphillip.vic.gov.au

路易丝·克劳馥 0466 514 643
Louise.Crawford@portphillip.vic.gov.au

蒂姆·巴克斯特 0466 495 250
Tim.Baxter@portphillip.vic.gov.au


五位失去联系的议员——Cunsolo、Baxter、Copsey、Martin 和 Crawford——表现出对居民和纳税人的漠视。

五位议员- 在这些艰难的 Covid 时期投票反对冻结利率。这样做的成本仅为 198 万美元。

五位议员- 拒绝冻结利率,尽管市议会预测现金盈余为 440 万澳元,加上新房产的 230 万澳元。

五名议员- 然后在少数群体的施舍和宠物项目上增加了 135 万美元的支出,对整个社区的贡献很小。

我们说
让政治远离菲利普港。我们支付的高昂费用让居民得到的很少。是时候指责议员们提高我们的费率、浪费金钱并违背居民和纳税人的利益。如果这五位议员不能在 COVID 期间投票赞成冻结利率,他们什么时候会?

...更多
部分标题中的单词
RoPP 活动成功推迟了新的 Bin Tax

UPDATE 15 AUGUST 2020: RoPP campaign successful in delaying new Bin Tax

We are pleased to see that the Bin Tax will not be introduced this financial year, according to Port Phillip’s updated web page.

Thanks to all for your help with our Bin Tax campaign!

The best way to ensure your rates are reduced to be in line with neighbouring councils, is to vote for a RoPP endorsed candidate at the upcoming October election. We will be releasing the exciting news about our endorsed candidates soon, so stay tuned.

  • At the 4th December 2019 Council meeting, a “Waste and Amenity levy” was proposed to address the waste crisis, forecasted to add $64 million over the next 10 years to Council’s “rate cap challenge”. RoPP spoke at that meeting in opposition to the new Tax, unless the Council could provide more information.
  • We finally received a written response from the CEO on July 2nd 2020, confirming that Council were considering options of how to fund the Bin Tax, including the levy being additional to existing rates.
  • Our poster and leaflet campaign to stop the Bin Tax commenced on 30th July 2020.
  • Council’s website still detailed the impending Bin Tax. Now those details have been removed, replaced instead with a statement about the deferral.
  • Why would Council remove the details from their website? As of writing this, the minutes of the 4th December 2019 Council meeting where the Bin Tax was voted on, are also no longer available on their website. Further, we have discovered that almost 20 years of Council meeting agendas & minutes have been removed in the last week.
  • Please refer to the end of this webpage for details of the Essential Services Commission’s role in waste levies.

The facts and our transparency speak for themselves. The Council’s backdown on a new Bin Tax shows that our campaign has had an impact. Council have rightly recognised the harshness of introducing a new tax on top of the burden of existing rates, in a time of economic crisis.

Port Phillip Council is one of the highest spending councils in the state and are now proposing to introduce an additional Waste and Amenity levy on top of the exorbitant rates you already pay.
See https://ropp.org.au/fact-check-how-high-are-port-phillip-rates-compared-to-neighbouring-councils/

So in addition to a 2% increase to total rates collected this year (the maximum allowable under the State government’s rate cap system), you would have to pay a levy for ‘Waste and Amenity’, “A BIN TAX” on this fundamental service. This would severely impact both ratepayers and residents at a time when many have lost their livelihoods, incomes and ability to pay.

Council claims that the reason they need to charge a new levy is because waste costs are rising at a greater pace than inflation. There are two issues with this:

1. Waste management, a core service of council, only accounts for 5.3% of the Port Phillip budget[1], meaning that even if this component increased by 10% per year, the effect on the overall budget would only be around 1-1.2%, well within the 2% rate cap.

2. Competent management should be able to absorb this fundamental service easily, by forecasting these cost issues and re-prioritising their budget accordingly. Instead, the majority of the 2% increase in general rates will go towards wage rises for staff, which council has stubbornly refused to address (or even acknowledge).

Council wants to take the easy way out yet again, by charging ratepayers a new BIN TAX instead of doing the hard work necessary to manage the budget.

The waste and amenity levy (BIN TAX) would sit outside the 2% annual rate cap imposed by the Essential Services Commission. This gives council the option to increase the levy by whatever amount it wishes, and you can be sure it will – council will use the levy to fund its inability to manage its own budget. Council describes this inability to live within their own means the ‘rate capping challenge’.

IT’S A NEW TAX ON TOP OF YOUR EXISTING RATES

Councillors did not want to be held accountable at the ballot box for introducing a new tax this year, so have deferred its introduction until after the election. We are here to highlight the issue so that you have the chance to stop council by voting for an independent candidate that will vote against the BIN TAX and hold the council to account. Keep an eye on our website for an independent review of candidates running in the October election.

 We say:
1. ROPP does not support the introduction of a Waste and Amenity Levy in addition to the burden of existing rates. Council need to get the budget under control instead of taking the easy way out: a new Bin Tax

2. Now is not the time to impose new taxes on a struggling economy. It’s not fair and it needs to be stopped.

Essential Services Commission’s role in waste levies
Council can levy a new charge in addition to existing rates, just like two councils did in 2018-19. This is subject to the oversight of the Essential Services Commission, however Councils retain full autonomy to introduce new charges. Council can opt to introduce a waste levy in a revenue neutral way, reducing general rates by the same amount that the new levy raises. This is what Maribyrnong did in 2019-20.

As Port Phillip Council said themselves on the now removed ‘waste challenges’ webpage :
 “Council is also considering a proposal to introduce a waste and amenity levy, which would be a payment separate to Council rates to cover some, or all, of the costs incurred by council to deliver waste, recycling and cleansing services. This would enable Council to set a service rate or charge (levy) that’s in line with the true cost of the service.

...更多