本地新聞
議會使我們的長期老年人難以留在家中。

我們說 - 降低老年人的利率,而不是強迫他們離開家園或負債。

菲利普港有許多居民,比如 Tanya*,他們面臨著議會要求他們支付高額費用的噩夢,他們知道他們永遠無法支付少量的固定收入或養老金。在大多數情況下,這些居民只是超支的議會和難以承受的房價的無辜受害者。

例如,1983 年阿德里安在米德爾帕克買下他的第一套房子時,年費為 500 美元。現在他們是 5000 美元,但服務水平並沒有顯著提高。市議會對這些陷入困境的居民的解決方案是將他們的財產反向抵押給市議會或出售並搬到其他地方。然後,市議會對他們的房屋提出警告。

微不足道的“幫助”委員會為養老金卡上的人提供

https://www.portphillip.vic.gov.au/council-services/rates-and-valuations/rates-concessions-and-rates-hardship-relief

菲利普港的許多退休居民都是他們社區的忠實擁護者。許多人在他們現在居住的地區出生和長大,並以我們的郊區為家而自豪。當議會無情地將利率提高到墨爾本其他地區所沒有的水平時,必須質疑一個迫使老年人取消抵押房屋的利率系統的公平性。

在本已緊張的一年裡,菲利普港目前的高利率給我們的老年人增加了不必要的壓力。他們只想安靜地過著自己的生活,靠著固定的收入,在他們養家糊口的房子裡。

我們說——我們不應該容忍這種對老年人的駭人聽聞的待遇,我們要求應該降低老年人的費率。理事會每年花費數百萬美元用於無聊的意識形態項目,這些項目浪費了我們數百萬美元,只會增加退休人員的壓力。幾乎 42% 的市議會收入用於僱用 800-900 名市政府公務員,比鄰近的市政府要多得多,這是我們高利率的原因之一。許多人似乎是為了無休止地寫報告而存在,並不直接參與提供服務。這是一個龐大的自私自利的官僚機構,在提高效率和提高生產力方面有很大空間,因此我們可以更好地照顧社區中的弱勢群體。真正的慈善事業應該從長期居住在菲利普港市的老年納稅人開始。

我們的議員和我們的議會讓我們的居民負債累累。

*Tanya 的故事是真實的,並且在整個菲利普港都有迴響,但為了保護她的身份,她的名字和麵孔已被更改。市議會為退休人員提供延遲支付差餉的選擇權,直到他們的房產被出售,屆時他們將收取未付的差餉加上每年 5% 的利息,這實際上是一種反向抵押貸款。

...更多
Promotion
菲利普港(Port Phillip)停車場問題困擾我們的街道

失去聯繫的議會正在拆除停車場,而很少考慮居民和商人的需求。

市政局在財政上對停車場的收費和罰款有很大的依賴性,並且正在執行意識形態上的使命,要求拆除停車場。菲利普港灣委員會可持續交通政策和停車費率“理事會正在尋求減少對私家車使用的依賴。”市議會與居民脫節,因為當我們已經支付高昂的費用並且沒有足夠的停車場時,我們不希望支付停車許可證。安理會正在抓住任何機會籌集現金,以資助其龐大的官僚機構。停車位已成為其無所不用其極的雷達,幾乎不考慮居民或零售企業的需求。

RoPP的停車政策:

  • 所有符合條件的財產一張免費許可證。
  • 鼓勵客戶以低成本停車位購物。
  • 我們不支持在社區中不必要地拆除停車場,尤其是在購物區。
  • 使用現實世界中的汽車擁有量和停車數據來評估社區和商人現在和將來的停車需求。
  • 確保有足夠和公平的房屋停車位。 *確保所有公寓樓開發項目的所有公寓均設有現場停車位。

在停車和交通管理方面,市政局與居民的需求脫節。儘管絕大多數居民擁有一輛或多輛汽車*,但菲利普港議會的意識形態重點仍然放在停車位的撤除上,儘管已經確定汽車對我們的社區至關重要。特別適合家庭購物,帶孩子上學或參加體育運動,上下班通勤或探望家人和朋友。對於老年人尤其如此。

市政局的意識形態對狹窄的街道產生了不利影響,當自行車道放置在錯誤的位置時,這會給駕駛員帶來更大的困難,也給騎自行車的人帶來更大的危險。拆除寶貴的停車位,這對我們的商人來說是一筆生意。市政廳的審慎戰略正在改變我們不斷壯大的社區-並非變得更好。

費茲羅伊(Fitzroy)和阿克蘭(Acland)大街曾經繁榮,我們城市的標誌性建築因規劃不周而致。大多數路邊停車位已被拆除,將這些曾經繁華和吸引人的景點變成安靜的零售回水區。

規劃增長
儘管市議會期望社區人數會增加,但他們正在減少我們的行車道和停車位。缺乏足夠的停車場和過高的成本使我們的社區和遊客在菲利普港(Port Phillip)的餐飲或購物望而卻步。

https://www.portphillip.vic.gov.au/about-the-council/strategies-policies-and-plans/transport-policies-strategies-and-plans

居民路邊停車
菲利普港務局內的房價是墨爾本最高的***,但居民仍需支付停車許可證。與附近的議會居民不同,格倫埃拉(Glen Eira)居民免費獲得一張停車許可證,斯托寧頓(Stonnington)居民獲得兩張免費停車許可證,貝賽德(Bayside)居民獲得四張免費停車許可證。有人會認為,對於我們被迫支付的高昂費用,我們至少能夠免費將一輛我們的車輛免費停放在自己的家中。但是我們的理事會需要現金,因此他們需要收取額外的年度“停車許可證”費用。另一種“反社區稅”

最近,RoPP向理事會詢問了這些費用,這是理事會的答复:
停車許可證定價並非旨在增加收入,而是實現成本中立的結果安理會工作人員

我們說–如果是這種情況,那麼為什麼理事會首先收取此費用,而不是僅免費向符合條件的居民提供路邊停車位?
如果候選人在即將舉行的選舉中獲得安理會內部權力平衡,我們對納稅人的保證是,我們將確保符合條件的納稅人在路邊停車是免費的。

市政局應最大限度地利用停車位,並儘量減少居民的費用,以向依賴便捷停車位的大多數社區提供便利。居民的停車費應合理,理事會不應依靠居民的過多停車收入來支撐預算**。
由於停車費用,不應阻止居民和訪客在菲利普港(Port Phillip)郊遊。

...更多
Promotion
暢所欲言
Promotion
Promotion
理事會觀察
菲利普港灣(Port Phillip)的房價與鄰近的議會相比如何?
如果您住在我們毗鄰的議會之一(例如Bayside,Stonnington或Glen Eira),您的房價將是多少?這是您找出真實情況的機會。

單擊下面的鏈接轉到我們的費率計算器,您只需在其中輸入您的財產價值並查找。
https://ropp.org.au/compare-your-rates-how-does-port-phillip-compare-with-neighbouring-councils/

...更多
理事會發布了2021-22年預算草案,以徵詢社區意見。

理事會已發布了2021-22年預算草案,以徵詢社區意見。如果您擔心安理會再次提高利率的計劃並且尚未這樣做,請聯繫以下議員,並要求他們在6月23日對議案進行表決時不要在2021-22預算中提高利率。

  • 巴克斯特
    Tim.Baxter@portphillip.vic.gov.au
    0466 495 250
  • 科普西(Cr Copsey)
    Katherine.Copsey@portphillip.vic.gov.au
    0466 478 949
  • 克勞福德市長
    Louise.Crawford@portphillip.vic.gov.au
    0466 514 643
  • 鉻昆索洛
    Heather.Cunsolo@portphillip.vic.gov.au
    0466 227 014
  • 馬丁
    彼得·馬丁@ portphillip.vic.gov.au
    0435 390 821

只有四位議員公開表示他們支持降息。他們是:

  • 鉻鍵
    Andrew.Bond@portphillip.vic.gov.au
    0481 034 028
  • 克拉克
    Rhonda.Clark@portphillip.vic.gov.au
    0435 098 738
  • 鉻珍珠
    馬庫斯·皮爾@ portphillip.vic.gov.au
    0466 448 272
  • 西拉科夫(Cr Sirakoff)
    克里斯蒂娜·西拉科夫(Christina.Sirakoff@portphillip.vic.gov.au)
    0435 419 930

你還應該知道些什麼?
我們認為,理事會必須提高為社區提供服務的效率。安理會告訴我們,凍結價格意味著必須削減服務,但我們說安理會不需要準備沒人要或不願閱讀的報告。撰寫長度為200或300頁的人無法閱讀的報告不是一項服務。如果議員投票贊成凍結利率,那麼首席執行官及其團隊將需要確定效率,而不是削減服務。菲利普港議會否認菲利普港存在房價問題,但納稅人只是痛苦地意識到,他們為相鄰議會中具有類似價值的房產所付房價的價格是其兩倍,三倍或更多倍。市議會使用平均費率將菲利普港灣與其他市議會進行基準比較,但平均費率具有誤導性和欺騙性,因為我們單位/公寓與房屋的比率高得多,而且偏向於平均數/比率偏低。

請參閱以下網址的事實檢查:https://ropp.org.au/fact-check-how-high-are-port-phillip-rates-compared-to-neighbouring-councils/

...更多
RoPP 活動成功推遲了新的 Bin Tax

UPDATE 15 AUGUST 2020: RoPP campaign successful in delaying new Bin Tax

We are pleased to see that the Bin Tax will not be introduced this financial year, according to Port Phillip’s updated web page.

Thanks to all for your help with our Bin Tax campaign!

The best way to ensure your rates are reduced to be in line with neighbouring councils, is to vote for a RoPP endorsed candidate at the upcoming October election. We will be releasing the exciting news about our endorsed candidates soon, so stay tuned.

  • At the 4th December 2019 Council meeting, a “Waste and Amenity levy” was proposed to address the waste crisis, forecasted to add $64 million over the next 10 years to Council’s “rate cap challenge”. RoPP spoke at that meeting in opposition to the new Tax, unless the Council could provide more information.
  • We finally received a written response from the CEO on July 2nd 2020, confirming that Council were considering options of how to fund the Bin Tax, including the levy being additional to existing rates.
  • Our poster and leaflet campaign to stop the Bin Tax commenced on 30th July 2020.
  • Council’s website still detailed the impending Bin Tax. Now those details have been removed, replaced instead with a statement about the deferral.
  • Why would Council remove the details from their website? As of writing this, the minutes of the 4th December 2019 Council meeting where the Bin Tax was voted on, are also no longer available on their website. Further, we have discovered that almost 20 years of Council meeting agendas & minutes have been removed in the last week.
  • Please refer to the end of this webpage for details of the Essential Services Commission’s role in waste levies.

The facts and our transparency speak for themselves. The Council’s backdown on a new Bin Tax shows that our campaign has had an impact. Council have rightly recognised the harshness of introducing a new tax on top of the burden of existing rates, in a time of economic crisis.

Port Phillip Council is one of the highest spending councils in the state and are now proposing to introduce an additional Waste and Amenity levy on top of the exorbitant rates you already pay.
See https://ropp.org.au/fact-check-how-high-are-port-phillip-rates-compared-to-neighbouring-councils/

So in addition to a 2% increase to total rates collected this year (the maximum allowable under the State government’s rate cap system), you would have to pay a levy for ‘Waste and Amenity’, “A BIN TAX” on this fundamental service. This would severely impact both ratepayers and residents at a time when many have lost their livelihoods, incomes and ability to pay.

Council claims that the reason they need to charge a new levy is because waste costs are rising at a greater pace than inflation. There are two issues with this:

1. Waste management, a core service of council, only accounts for 5.3% of the Port Phillip budget[1], meaning that even if this component increased by 10% per year, the effect on the overall budget would only be around 1-1.2%, well within the 2% rate cap.

2. Competent management should be able to absorb this fundamental service easily, by forecasting these cost issues and re-prioritising their budget accordingly. Instead, the majority of the 2% increase in general rates will go towards wage rises for staff, which council has stubbornly refused to address (or even acknowledge).

Council wants to take the easy way out yet again, by charging ratepayers a new BIN TAX instead of doing the hard work necessary to manage the budget.

The waste and amenity levy (BIN TAX) would sit outside the 2% annual rate cap imposed by the Essential Services Commission. This gives council the option to increase the levy by whatever amount it wishes, and you can be sure it will – council will use the levy to fund its inability to manage its own budget. Council describes this inability to live within their own means the ‘rate capping challenge’.

IT’S A NEW TAX ON TOP OF YOUR EXISTING RATES

Councillors did not want to be held accountable at the ballot box for introducing a new tax this year, so have deferred its introduction until after the election. We are here to highlight the issue so that you have the chance to stop council by voting for an independent candidate that will vote against the BIN TAX and hold the council to account. Keep an eye on our website for an independent review of candidates running in the October election.

 We say:
1. ROPP does not support the introduction of a Waste and Amenity Levy in addition to the burden of existing rates. Council need to get the budget under control instead of taking the easy way out: a new Bin Tax

2. Now is not the time to impose new taxes on a struggling economy. It’s not fair and it needs to be stopped.

Essential Services Commission’s role in waste levies
Council can levy a new charge in addition to existing rates, just like two councils did in 2018-19. This is subject to the oversight of the Essential Services Commission, however Councils retain full autonomy to introduce new charges. Council can opt to introduce a waste levy in a revenue neutral way, reducing general rates by the same amount that the new levy raises. This is what Maribyrnong did in 2019-20.

As Port Phillip Council said themselves on the now removed ‘waste challenges’ webpage :
 “Council is also considering a proposal to introduce a waste and amenity levy, which would be a payment separate to Council rates to cover some, or all, of the costs incurred by council to deliver waste, recycling and cleansing services. This would enable Council to set a service rate or charge (levy) that’s in line with the true cost of the service.

...更多
Promotion